Acquisition
Advertising spend and the people reached, with the cost and response to each visit.
If marketing counts submissions and sales counts accepted opportunities, both can report accurately and still disagree. I start with definitions, identifiers and the route between systems.
The deliverable is a usable decision view: what is counted, what is missing and what the evidence can support. Attribution allocates credit; it does not prove that every credited sale was caused by a campaign.
What I need from you: Website, tag and analytics access, campaign data, CRM field definitions and the people responsible for sales reporting.
Choose what fits your situation. You’ll get a suggested starting point.
Choose an area. See what I check and where I would focus the work.
I validate the journey end to end and remove missing, duplicate or unnecessary events.
I define meaningful events and funnel stages, then make their reporting purpose explicit.
I clean up GTM naming, ownership and obsolete tags, with documented release checks.
I reconcile overlapping claims and use CRM evidence without treating an attribution model as certainty.
I align lifecycle definitions and source capture between marketing and sales.
I agree metric definitions, separate leadership and operational views, and reduce manual reporting.
Fixing these issues creates a more reliable foundation for every acquisition and growth decision built on top of the data.
Open the part that matters to you. The detail is here when you need it.
Start with the decision: which channel creates accepted opportunities, where buyers leave the journey, or whether another budget increase is affordable. Then choose the tracking and report detail needed to answer it.
The stages and measures depend on the business model. We keep the definition and timing of each action clear, from first visit to sale, so a cheap early action can be judged against its later value.
Advertising spend and the people reached, with the cost and response to each visit.
The share of visitors who submit an inquiry, sign up or request a demo, and what each action costs.
Which enquiries meet the qualification criteria agreed with sales.
Open sales opportunities, their acquisition cost and how marketing helped create or develop them.
New-customer cost, earned revenue, recurring subscriptions and customer value.
A buyer may encounter ads, content, referrals and sales conversations before purchasing. I use platform reports alongside customer and sales records to judge the evidence, and use focused tests when the next investment needs a clearer answer.
Leadership may need costs, revenue and risks; a channel owner needs the detail behind a change. I structure the views around those jobs, with clear definitions and a route to investigate an unexpected result.
Revenue, pipeline, CAC, ROAS, growth trends, and commercial KPIs.
Acquisition, conversion, funnel movement, channel efficiency, and experiment performance.
Spend, CPL, CPA, lead quality, opportunity cost, and revenue contribution.
Non-brand traffic, rankings, conversions, pipeline, and organic revenue.
Lead progression, email engagement, opportunity conversion, retention, and reactivation.
The reporting structure should reflect how the business actually operates rather than force every stakeholder into the same dashboard.
I can work in GA4, Google Tag Manager and Looker Studio, define campaign naming and connect reporting with CRM outcomes. Where development is required, I provide the event requirements and validation checks, then work alongside your technical team.
Five engagements, each with its original business context. Follow the choice, implementation and outcome; we adapt the relevant method to your B2B journey.
GA4 · GTM · CRM · Offline Conversions · Looker Studio
Usable source information rose from 54% to 91% of opportunities after campaign identifiers and sales-stage definitions were matched.
Within six weeks: 54% → 91% Usable Opportunity Sources · 4 Hours → 45 Minutes Weekly Reconciliation · Shared Pipeline-Based Channel Reviews
Read the case studyGTM · GA4 E-commerce Events · Checkout · Order System
Order-level checks reduced the reporting gap to 3%, exposing duplicate purchases and inconsistent revenue definitions before campaign budgets were judged.
Within four weeks: 21% → 3% Revenue Reporting Gap · Duplicate Purchase Events Below 1% · One Shared Revenue Definition · 4-Week Measurement Rebuild
Read the case studyGA4 Funnel Events · GTM · Booking Flow · Device Segmentation
Mobile form completion improved from 2.4% to 3.3%, with booking and attendance checked so the fix did not move the problem elsewhere.
2.4% → 3.3% Mobile Form Completion · 58% → 67% Booking-to-Attendance · 8-Week Improvement Cycle
Read the case studyPlatform Attribution · GA4 · CRM / Order Data · Incrementality Tests
A limited budget test reduced acquisition cost by 14% at comparable new-customer volume, without treating overlapping platform claims as proof.
-14% Acquisition Cost at Comparable New-Customer Volume · €90K Monthly Media Budget · -60% Reporting Time · Every Budget Recommendation Documented With Evidence and Uncertainty
Read the case studyLooker Studio · KPI Definitions · Executive Reporting
Preparation fell from two days to half a day, with important metrics tied to a decision, an owner and follow-up.
2 Days → 0.5 Day Report Preparation · 100% Priority Metric Ownership · Decision Backlog 14 → 5 · 8-Week Reporting Redesign
Read the case studyHave a related project? Let’s discuss the scope.
Discuss your growth challenge ↗Analytics & Measurement / Your next move
Bring the decision nobody can settle, the reports that disagree and the system that records the sales outcome. That gives the investigation a starting point.